Site Logo
Looking for girlfriend or boyfriend > Looking for a friend > Can a circumcised man get a uti

Can a circumcised man get a uti

Site Logo

Circumcision, whereby the foreskin is removed from the penis, can cause the urethral opening to narrow, making it difficult to urinate. The condition is called meatal stenosis and the risk of developing it is times higher in circumcised than intact boys under the age of ten. Meatal stenosis can occur several years after circumcision, and may lead to infection if left untreated. The only solution is a minor operation under general anaesthesia. In , the Danish National Board of Health estimated that between 1, and 2, boys are ritually circumcised in Denmark each year.

SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) - Symptoms & Treatment - Dr. Robert Matthews

Study: Uncircumcised Boys Have a Higher Risk of UTI

Site Logo

The risk-benefit profile of neonatal circumcision is not clear. Most studies have focused on urinary tract infections but other health sequelae have not been evaluated.

While evidence supports benefits of circumcision, a lack of randomized trials has been cited as a weakness. National guidelines provide mixed recommendations regarding neonatal circumcision. We review the weight of evidence and utilize current statistical methodology on observational data to examine the risks and benefits of neonatal circumcision. Circumcision is the most common procedure performed on newborns.

While it has been performed for thousands of years for religious and medical reasons, its use is still controversial. Regional and cultural discrepancies in circumcision rates exist nationally and internationally.

Indeed, national medical panels from different countries have arrived at different conclusions and recommendations when reviewing the literature. Similarly, recent Canadian Pediatric Society recommended circumcision in only certain circumstances; however, the methodology of the evidence evaluation has been questioned [ 2 , 3 ]. The Royal Dutch Medical Association recommends deterrence [ 4 ].

Nevertheless, many health benefits of circumcision have been suggested, including lower rates of urinary tract infection UTI , human immunodeficiency virus acquisition, herpes simplex virus acquisition, syphilis transmission, penile cancer, balanitis, phimosis, bacterial vaginosis in female partners, human papilloma virus transmission and cervical cancer in female partners [ 1 ].

Indeed, the Centers for Disease Control CDC recently released proposed recommendations for counseling parents and uncircumcised adolescents and adult males about the benefits of circumcision [ 5 ]. However, the low overall rate of UTIs in the infant population demonstrated in several large cohort studies, suggested that the number needed to circumcise to prevent one hospitalization for UTI was between and [ 6 , 7 ]. Importantly, pediatric studies of UTI and circumcision have been restricted to UTI alone, thus other health sequelae, such as renal or hypertensive disease, have not been evaluated [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ].

While most complications are minor, several societies have voiced concerns about the risk to benefit ratio. Even the American Academy of Pediatrics, which acknowledges the benefits of circumcision, has stopped short of recommending neonatal circumcision and instead has suggested the procedure should be offered to the parents of healthy children so that an informed decision can be made [ 1 ].

In contrast, the CDC's detailed report on circumcision calculates the benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks by to 1 [ 13 ]. A meta-analysis in , which included data on , children 19 studies as well as older boys and men, concluded that there is a lifetime benefit to circumcision which prevents UTI [ 14 ]. A recent systematic review published in concluded that early infant circumcision should not be considered controversial and suggested that a decline in national rates of circumcision were a threat to public health [ 4 ].

However, the most recent Cochrane review identified no randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials RCTs examining circumcision and UTI [ 15 ].

The authors concluded that further data was needed before circumcision could be recommended [ 1 ]. Indeed, there are significant sociodemographic and economic differences between families utilizing circumcision which may also influence relevant outcomes [ 16 ].

However, limiting the analysis to only randomized controlled trial RCT, excludes the wealth of data provided by observational studies over the past several decades. There are significant financial, ethical, and logistical challenges to performing RCTs. In such instances, investigators have used observational data to attempt to guide policies. Yet observational data may be biased as differences in baseline characteristics may impact both the treatment and outcome.

However, with detailed clinical data, many confounding factors can be adjusted for using analytical models. Moreover, several analytic techniques can help account for overt or hidden biases especially when unmeasured patient characteristics can affect the disease and outcome. We used data from an ongoing study of a geographically and demographically diverse cohort of industrial workers and their families to determine the association between circumcision and the incidence of UTIs and surgical complications to simultaneously assess risks and benefits of neonatal circumcision.

The design of the parent study has been previously described [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Briefly, as part of continuing monitoring of employee health and safety, employee medical, insurance, and workplace records are compiled. Data on over K employees from around the US i. Using insurance claims data, we identified boys that underwent neonatal circumcision prior to 1 month of age.

The circumcised group was compared to uncircumcised boys. Diagnosis and treatment codes were used to identify urinary infections, surgical complications, or urologic imaging.

In all, we identified 2, boys who underwent neonatal circumcision and who did not during the study period. Method of delivery and length of stay were also associated with circumcision status Table 1. Propensity-based matching produced circumcised boys and uncircumcised boys matched with similar patient characteristics, indicating a high degree of similarity in the distributions of prognostic variables Table 1. A total of 39 boys were diagnosed with a UTI during 3, Similar results were also seen for propensity score risk adjustment HR, 0.

Comparisons represent cox regression models after adjustment for age, race, method of delivery, length of birth hospitalization, employee type, location of the factor, and year of birth. Importantly, no difference in the rate of UTI was identified in the first two weeks of life.

However, up to 2 years of age, uncircumcised boys had a higher rate of UTIs compared to circumcised boys 2. This number decreased to 25 when we included other sequelae i. The overall rate of hospitalization was also significantly higher for uncircumcised boys Table 2. Importantly, the incidence of other diseases not associated with urologic disease did not vary based on circumcision status such as bronchiolitis, respiratory syncytial virus infections, and ear infections were similar across all time periods examined.

Similar results were seen with propensity matching or propensity score adjusted models. In addition, a significantly higher rate of radiologic procedures i. Unlike UTIs, the difference in radiologic evaluation between circumcised and uncircumcised boys began in the first 2 weeks of life. Over the first two years, uncircumcised boys had a significantly higher rate of radiologic evaluation of urinary organs compared to circumcised boys 2.

The number needed to treat with circumcision to prevent one radiologic evaluation was MV: multivariate analysis, pr mtch: propensity score matching, prop: proportion test, US: ultrasound, NA: not available. Model a represents addition of propensity score to multivariable model for entire cohort. Model b represents propensity matched cohort. When examining surgical complications, no differences were seen at each time point for composite end-points when comparing circumcised and uncircumcised boys.

Prior reports have demonstrated a lower UTI rate in boys after circumcision. They noted an fold increased UTI rate among uncircumcised boys compared to circumcised boys which was reflected in the decline prevalence of neonatal circumcision over this time period. A cohort study from Canada reported a risk reduction of 3. While socioeconomics were estimated with geocoding, the homogeneity of the population limits generalizability.

An analysis of members of the Kaiser Permanente Northern California system in identified 28, infants. A fold higher cost for managing UTIs in uncircumcised boys was noted reflecting higher rates of hospitalization [ 6 ]. UTIs early in life can lead to renal and hypertensive disease, thus it is important to consider these diseases as well. Moreover, a UTI in a male often prompts evaluation including urologic imaging.

In addition to UTIs, circumcised boys also experience a lower utilization of diagnostic imaging with its associated costs financial and emotional. As with all observational data, it is important to note the important baseline sociodemographic differences among boys utilizing and not utilizing circumcision as this can lead to bias.

However, application of multivariable, propensity score risk adjustment, and propensity score matching can minimize the impact of overt bias in patient characteristics [ 25 , 26 ]. The mechanism whereby circumcision may lower urinary infection rates has been studied. Studies demonstrate an accumulation of urinary pathogens under the prepuce and in the urethra of uncircumcised boys [ 27 ]. While severity of infection, including renal involvement or need for hospitalization, is affected by the specific urinary pathogen as well as the patient's anatomy, a urinary predisposition will increase a patient's rate of urologic complications.

Consistent with existing data, the risk reduction of UTI associated with circumcision is greatest early in life [ 28 ]. As chronic renal disease may predispose to additional lifelong health impairments, it is possible early circumcision may prove more beneficial with longer follow-up into the early and middle adulthood [ 10 , 11 ].

It is important to note that estimates using observational data can be subject to unmeasured selection bias. However, given that RCTs cannot guide all clinical decisions, in certain cases, observational data can be useful. IRB A portion of salary support for DG was provided by Alcoa. Disclosure: Dr.

Eisenberg is an adviser of the Sandstone Diagnostics and Glow, but he made no influence on this work in relation with the company or its products. Other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. Formal analysis: Galusha D. Funding acquisition: Cullen MR. Project administration: Cullen MR. Resources: Cullen MR.

Writing original draft : Eisenberg ML. National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. World J Mens Health. Published online Mar Michael L. Eisenberg , 1, 2 Deron Galusha , 3 William A. Kennedy , 1 and Mark R. Cullen 4. Find articles by Michael L. Find articles by Deron Galusha. William A. Find articles by William A. Mark R. Find articles by Mark R. Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer.

Corresponding author.

The Relationship between Neonatal Circumcision, Urinary Tract Infection, and Health

Brian Morris at the University of Sydney and Thomas Wiswell a neonatologist in Orlando concluded that, over the lifetime, the single risk factor of the foreskin confers a 1-in-4 chance of getting a UTI during the male lifetime. This represented the difference between lifetime UTI prevalence in uncircumcised males 1-in-3 and lifetime prevalence in circumcised males 1-in It was found that circumcision reduced the risk of an infant getting a UTI by fold. For boys aged 1 to 16 years, the protective effect was 6.

Uncircumcised boys are at a higher risk for urinary tract infections compared with circumcised boys, a new study finds. The study involved close to boys ages 3 years or younger who went to the hospital with symptoms of a urinary tract infection. Results showed that about 25 percent of uncircumcised boys had urinary tract infection s, compared with 5 percent of circumcised boys.

Worldwide, male circumcision is done for religious or cultural reasons, and to a lesser degree for medical indications. Newborn male circumcision is associated with fewer genitourinary infections in younger males. In the current decade, a substantial body of research suggests that male circumcision is effective as a prophylactic measure against HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. The compelling HIV reductions in 3 African randomized control trials in circumcised men have prompted use of male circumcision as a key part of HIV prevention in developing nations. More recently, the use of male circumcision as a public health measure in developed nations is a topic of international discussion.

Male circumcision greatly increases risk of urinary tract problems

Design and Setting. Main Outcome Measure. Escherichia coli was the most common urinary isolate 15 of 26 isolates , and the majority of E coli strains possessed urovirulence determinants, including mannoseresistant hemagglutination 10 of 14 isolates , F fimbriae 11 of 14 isolates , P fimbriae 6 of 14 isolates , hemolysin 10 of 14 isolates , and aerobactin 8 of 14 isolates. Coronavirus Resource Center. All Rights Reserved. Twitter Facebook Email. This Issue.

COVID-19 Update

The risk-benefit profile of neonatal circumcision is not clear. Most studies have focused on urinary tract infections but other health sequelae have not been evaluated. While evidence supports benefits of circumcision, a lack of randomized trials has been cited as a weakness. National guidelines provide mixed recommendations regarding neonatal circumcision.

Learn about our expanded patient care options for your health care needs.

Highest risk is in infancy, where UTI is times higher in uncircumcised males. The highest prevalence and greatest severity of UTIs in boys is prior to 6 months of age [Wiswell, a; Schoen et al. The younger the infant, the more likely and severe will be the UTI and the greater the risk of sepsis and death [Schoen, c].

Male Circumcision and Infection

She has my sympathies—urinary tract infections are painful and their association with sex is distressing. Unfortunately, few people seem to actually understand why they occur or how to prevent them. To start with since the instigation of this post focused on the status of the male member, let me say clearly—whether a male partner is circumcised or intact is not a factor in UTIs.


Before circumcision, the foreskin covers the tip of the penis glans. After circumcision, the tip of the penis is exposed. Circumcision is the surgical removal of the skin covering the tip of the penis. The procedure is fairly common for newborn boys in certain parts of the world, including the United States. Circumcision after the newborn period is possible, but it's a more complex procedure.

Urinary Tract Infections

Among the few alleged benefits of circumcision that are of actual relevance to children, the most prominent is the claim that it protects against urinary tract infections in the first year of life. The degree of relative risk reduction for circumcised boys is most often reported as fold over a small absolute incidence , based on retrospective data. To put UTIs into perspective, a study from Sweden, where boys are not circumcised, found that, over the first six years of life, the absolute risk of UTIs in boys was low, at 1. Army hospital databases to compare UTI rates in circumcised and intact infant males. In addition, these studies failed to control for potentially confounding factors, such as being born prematurely. Prematurity puts babies at higher risk of infections of all kinds due to their immature immune systems, and such infants are more likely to undergo catheterization for various reasons, in itself increasing the infection risk. However, premature babies are also typically not circumcised because of their fragile medical condition, thus prematurity itself rather than the presence of a foreskin could explain the higher rate of UTIs found in intact infants.

Circumcision - infections of the urinary tract (UTI) are regarded as being up to 44% of uncircumcised men, compared with 6% of circumcised men will get a UTI.

По крайней мере Мидж не станет болтать. У нее есть и свои слабости. Она ведь и сама кое-что себе позволяла: время от времени они массировали друг другу спину.

Circumcision May Lower Urinary Infection Risk

 - И сколько вы заплатите. Вздох облегчения вырвался из груди Беккера. Он сразу же перешел к делу: - Я могу заплатить вам семьсот пятьдесят тысяч песет. Пять тысяч американских долларов.

Lack of Circumcision Increases the Risk of Urinary Tract Infection in Young Men

 Там подают отличный карпаччо.  - Хейл улыбнулся.  - Что скажешь. А потом мы могли бы… - Выкинь это из головы.

 - Он задумчиво посмотрел на .

Разве не так, коммандер. - Ни в коем случае! - отрезал Стратмор. Хейл вскипел: - Послушайте меня, старина. Вы отпускаете меня и Сьюзан на вашем лифте, мы уезжаем, и через несколько часов я ее отпускаю. Стратмор понял, что ставки повышаются.

Красная, белая и синяя. Я нашел. В его голове смешались мысли о кольце, о самолете Лирджет-60, который ждал его в ангаре, и, разумеется, о Сьюзан. В тот момент, когда он поравнялся с сиденьем, на котором сидела девушка, и подумал, что именно ей скажет, автобус проехал под уличным фонарем, на мгновение осветившим лицо обладателя трехцветной шевелюры. Беккер смотрел на него, охваченный ужасом. Под густым слоем краски он увидел не гладкие девичьи щеки, а густую щетину.

Он протягивал свою изуродованную руку… пытаясь что-то сообщить. Танкадо хотел спасти наш банк данных, - говорила она.  - А мы так и не узнаем, как это сделать.

Comments: 5
  1. Fenrigore

    I can speak much on this theme.

  2. Nikoshakar

    I am final, I am sorry, would like to offer other decision.

  3. Nikorisar

    I am final, I am sorry, but this variant does not approach me.

  4. Zologor

    Understand me?

  5. Yozshugal

    It is obvious, you were not mistaken

Thanks! Your comment will appear after verification.
Add a comment

© 2020 Online - Advisor on specific issues.